Research
My research uses computational modeling and behavioral experiments to understand how people reason about other minds. I'm especially interested in the representations and computations underlying theory of mind — how we infer what others are thinking, feeling, and experiencing — and what happens when they are deployed in high-stakes real-world contexts like clinical care.
Quantitative reconstruction of other people's cognitive processes as Bayesian inverse reasoning
Berke, Sterling, Tenenbaum, Jara-Ettinger
under review
preprint
Earlier papers in this series
-
No signatures of first-person biases in theory of mind judgments about thinking
Berke, Sterling, Tenenbaum, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2024
pdf
-
Thinking about thinking as rational computation
Berke, Tenenbaum, Sterling, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2023
pdf
-
Thinking about thinking through inverse reasoning
Berke, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2021
link
Core knowledge, visual illusions & the discovery of the self
Berke, Jara-Ettinger ·
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2024
link
More papers in this line…
Berke, Jara-Ettinger · Integrating experience into Bayesian theory of mind ·
CogSci 2022
link
Zhang, Berke, Jara-Ettinger · Six-year-olds use an intuitive theory of attention to infer what others see, whom to trust, and what they want ·
CogSci 2025
link
People tailor lies to what others know and want (full version)
Berke, Sterling*, Zhi Yi*, Chandra, Jara-Ettinger (* equal contribution)
under review
Earlier papers in this series
-
People use theory of mind to craft lies exploiting audience desires (proceedings)
Berke*, Sterling*, Chandra, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2025 (* equal contribution)
link
-
Reasoning about knowledge in lie production
Zhi, Jara-Ettinger, Berke · CogSci 2024
link
Tracking minds in communication
Rubio-Fernandez, Berke, Jara-Ettinger ·
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2024
link
Toward a formalization of human intuitive theories of bodily pain
Berke, Collins, Tenenbaum, Saxe · CogSci 2026
Bodily core knowledge
Berke, Casser · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · commentary on Bai et al.
in press
Key outcomes of the vulvodynia therapeutic research summit
Krapf, Yong, Berke et al. ·
Obstetrics & Gynecology 2025
link
4. Comparative cognition
What representations does a system need for intelligent behavior?
A parallel thread uses evolutionary simulations, non-human primates, and artificial systems as mirrors for human cognition, allowing us to probe the kinds of representations that support intelligent behavior in the social and physical worlds.
In evolutionary simulations
Flexible goals require that inflexible perceptual systems produce veridical representations: implications for realism as revealed by evolutionary simulations
Berke, Walter-Terrill, Jara-Ettinger, Scholl ·
Cognitive Science 2022
pdf
In non-human primates
What primates know about other minds and when they use it: a computational approach to comparative theory of mind
Berke*, Horschler*, Royka, Santos, Jara-Ettinger (* equal contribution)
under review
preprint
Monkeys fail inference versions of classic intuitive physics prediction tasks
Royka, Townrow, Baker, Berke, Santos · CogSci 2026
In machines
MetaCOG: a hierarchical probabilistic model for learning meta-cognitive visual representations
Berke, Azerbayev, Belledonne, Tavares, Jara-Ettinger ·
UAI 2024
link ·
pdf