Research
My research uses computational modeling and behavioral experiments to understand how people reason about other minds. I'm especially interested in the representations and computations underlying theory of mind — how we infer what others are thinking, feeling, and experiencing — and what happens when they are deployed in high-stakes real-world contexts like clinical care.
Quantitative reconstruction of other people's cognitive processes as Bayesian inverse reasoning
Berke, Sterling, Tenenbaum, Jara-Ettinger
under review ·
preprint
Earlier work in this series
-
No signatures of first-person biases in theory of mind judgments about thinking
Berke, Sterling, Tenenbaum, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2024
pdf
-
Thinking about thinking as rational computation
Berke, Tenenbaum, Sterling, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2023
pdf
-
Thinking about thinking through inverse reasoning
Berke, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2021
link
Core knowledge, visual illusions & the discovery of the self
Berke, Jara-Ettinger ·
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2024
link
More papers in this line…
Berke, Jara-Ettinger · Integrating experience into Bayesian theory of mind ·
CogSci 2022
link
Zhang, Berke, Jara-Ettinger · Six-year-olds use an intuitive theory of attention to infer what others see, whom to trust, and what they want ·
CogSci 2025
link
People tailor lies to what others know and want
Berke, Sterling*, Zhi Yi*, Chandra, Jara-Ettinger (* equal contribution)
under review
Earlier work in this series
-
People use theory of mind to craft lies exploiting audience desires
Berke*, Sterling*, Chandra, Jara-Ettinger · CogSci 2025 (* equal contribution)
link
-
Reasoning about knowledge in lie production
Zhi, Jara-Ettinger, Berke · CogSci 2024
link
Tracking minds in communication
Rubio-Fernandez, Berke, Jara-Ettinger ·
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2024
link
Toward a formalization of human intuitive theories of bodily pain
Berke, Collins, Tenenbaum, Saxe ·
CogSci 2026
preprint
Bodily core knowledge
Berke, Casser ·
Behavioral and Brain Sciences · commentary on Bai et al.
in press ·
preprint
Key outcomes of the vulvodynia therapeutic research summit
Krapf, Yong, Berke et al. ·
Obstetrics & Gynecology 2025
link
4. Comparative cognition
What representations does a system need for intelligent behavior?
A parallel thread investigates representations in other kinds of cognitive systems — from non-human primates to artificial systems — in order to better understand the representations that support intelligent behavior writ large.
In evolutionary simulations
Flexible goals require that inflexible perceptual systems produce veridical representations: implications for realism as revealed by evolutionary simulations
Berke, Walter-Terrill, Jara-Ettinger, Scholl ·
Cognitive Science 2022
pdf
In non-human primates
What primates know about other minds and when they use it: a computational approach to comparative theory of mind
Berke*, Horschler*, Royka, Santos, Jara-Ettinger (* equal contribution)
under review ·
preprint
Monkeys fail inference versions of classic intuitive physics prediction tasks
Royka, Townrow, Baker, Berke, Santos · CogSci 2026
In machines
MetaCOG: a hierarchical probabilistic model for learning meta-cognitive visual representations
Berke, Azerbayev, Belledonne, Tavares, Jara-Ettinger ·
UAI 2024
link ·
pdf
Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study
Collins, Berke, Sucholutsky, Ali, Weller, O'Donnell, Brooke-Wilson*, Wong*, Tenenbaum* (* equal senior advising)
preprint